IBC Financial
Get Started
IBC Financial ibcfinancial.com

IBC Answers

What documents should I gather before any review of my policy?

What documents should I gather before any review of my policy?

Seven, and the insurer holds copies of most of them. The contract as issued, with every rider and endorsement. The illustration you were shown before purchase. The most recent annual statement. A current in force projection. The statement of any balance outstanding. Every change form signed since issue. And written confirmation of who is recorded as owner and beneficiary today.

What kind of answer this is

  • Claim type: Contract fact
  • Claim type: Professional judgment
  • Jurisdiction: Canada wide

That these documents exist and can be requested is a contract fact. That a review without them is a conversation rather than a reading is the author's professional judgment.

How it works

three mechanics, one of them fatal

How wealth actually crosses a generation

  1. What passes outside the estate by designation
  2. The deemed disposition that taxes almost everything else
  3. Whether the estate holds cash to pay that tax
  4. Selling assets to pay the tax is the common failure
The tax is predictable. The forced sale that pays it is what a plan is for.

Six of the seven are records the insurer already holds and will send to the recorded owner on request. The seventh, the illustration from before purchase, is usually only in your own file, and it is the one most often missing. Ask for the six in one written request.

The request itself follows a simple order. The owner of the contract, not the life insured if that is a different person, signs the request, because the insurer will only release the file to the person it has on record as owner. The insurer's service department then pulls the documents from its own system, checks the signature against the form on file, and mails or emails the package to the address it holds, which is why an address kept current matters as much as the request itself. A corporation that owns the contract sends the request on its own letterhead or through the officer authorized to sign for it, since the insurer will not deal with a shareholder who is not also the registered owner.

A contract that has moved from one insurer to another, through a merger or a sale of a block of business, complicates the request only slightly. The current insurer of record, found from the most recent statement received, is still the one to write to, since it now holds the file even where the letterhead on the original contract shows a different company name entirely. The name change itself does not alter a single guarantee written into the contract; it only changes the address the request is mailed to.

What can vary

two layers, both payable

What a wealth manager charges

  1. 01Mainly a share of the assets under management
  2. 02Hourly, flat fee and retainer structures also exist
  3. 03Funds held carry a management expense ratio of their own
  4. 04The two layers are separate and both are payable
The published schedule is one layer. The expense ratio inside the funds is the other.

Two insurers rarely package this the same way. One sends a single bound file within days. Another sends the contract separately from the statement and takes a call to the illustration department for the historical illustration, because that document sometimes sits with a different unit than the one that handles the annual statement.

Provincial location does not change what must be produced, since the duty to hold and release these records comes from the contract and the insurer's own recordkeeping practice rather than from provincial law, but it can change where a complaint goes if the insurer is slow. The wording used also drifts with the year of issue: a contract from the 1990s carries different rider names and a different statement layout than one issued last year, so a reader comparing a hand me down folder to a recent one should not expect matching headings.

Contract wording drives what even exists to send. A term rider added later, a conversion privilege exercised at some point, or a wording change following a settlement can each add a document that a contract without that history never generated. Two households holding contracts from the same insurer and the same year can therefore end up with folders of different sizes, and neither folder is wrong for it.

The cost or the catch

The folder takes a few weeks and no money. What it buys is the ability to test what anybody tells you, including this site. A review conducted on a statement alone can be sincere and still be wrong, because the statement does not contain the provisions that decide most questions.

Keep the copy received from the insurer in its own file once obtained, since reconstructing it a second time costs the same effort as the first.

The catch rarely mentioned concerns the illustration itself. Because it usually exists only on paper, kept in a drawer or a folder from the year of purchase, an insurer that never received a copy has none to send, and no fee will produce a document that was never filed with it. A household that cannot locate its own copy should say so plainly rather than assume the insurer is withholding it, since the two situations call for different next steps.

Who this matters to most

the discipline, not the product

What a household actually does differently

  1. 01A capital purchase arrives, a vehicle or a renovation
  2. 02The advance is taken against the contract instead
  3. 03A repayment schedule the household sets and keeps
  4. 04Repayment continues after the debt would have ended
  5. 05The money is not free, and interest accrues to the insurer
A household that stops paying when the balance clears has performed an ordinary loan through a more expensive instrument.

A household holding a contract issued many years ago, with several riders added since, a change of owner along the way, or a stretch where nobody looked at the file, has the most to gain from assembling the complete seven. Each amendment changes what the contract now says, and a folder missing even one change form can leave a reader working from terms the contract no longer carries.

It matters least to a household with a contract issued recently, unchanged since, held personally rather than through a corporation, and already reviewed within the past year using the same seven items. For that household the exercise confirms rather than corrects, though confirming still has value, since a folder confirmed once does not need to be rebuilt from nothing the next time a question comes up.

A household that inherited a contract, whether through a beneficiary designation or through an estate, sits between these two extremes. The coverage may be simple, but the paperwork trail belongs to someone no longer present to explain it, which is its own reason to gather everything named here rather than rely on a memory of what the deceased once said about the arrangement.

What to ask, and of whom

and what it ends

What a surrender actually pays

  1. 01The accumulated cash valueWhat the contract holds.
  2. 02Less any surrender chargeProvided by the contract.
  3. 03Less anything outstandingOn an advance, with the interest on it.
  4. 04What reaches youAny amount above the adjusted cost basis is taxable.
Early surrender is the dominant failure of this product, because the costs fall heaviest in the first years.

Ask the insurer's service centre, in writing, for the six items it holds, and ask specifically whether the file shows any change of owner or beneficiary that has not yet been confirmed back to the household in writing. A verbal answer over the phone is not the same as a letter that can be kept on file and shown to a professional later.

If the review is being done for tax reporting rather than for general understanding, the same folder should go to the accountant preparing the return, since a change form or an outstanding balance shown in the annual statement can affect what is reported for that year. A change involving ownership, a beneficiary designation, or an estate plan is a question for a lawyer or notary rather than for this page.

Where the review touches a policy loan already taken against the contract, the same written request should ask the insurer to state the outstanding balance and the interest rate applied as of the date of the letter, since both figures move over time and a number remembered from a year ago is not the number that applies today.

What this page will not do

This page describes what to gather. It does not read the documents once gathered and tell a household what they mean for its own situation, because that reading depends on the specific wording in that specific contract, which varies by insurer and by year of issue in ways a general page cannot anticipate.

Where the documents raise a tax question, the accountant preparing the return is the person positioned to answer it from the actual figures. Where they raise a legal question about ownership, an estate, or a beneficiary designation, a lawyer or notary licensed in the household's province is the person who owns that question. This page settles neither.

Where this answer may not apply

  • A corporately owned contract adds the corporate records: the resolution, the shareholders agreement and the accountant's treatment of the contract.
  • Where the contract is collateral for a loan or is named in a separation agreement, those documents govern and belong in the same folder.
  • Some insurers cannot produce a legible copy of a contract issued decades ago, and a certified reconstruction is what arrives instead.
  • Gathering the seven is preparation, not analysis. It tells you nothing on its own.

What to verify in your own contract

  • That the contract copy includes every endorsement, since a rider added later is often a separate page.
  • The date on the in force projection, which should be recent rather than convenient.
  • That the change forms in your file match what the insurer records, one by one.
  • Who is recorded as owner today, which is not always who paid.
  • Whether the designation is revocable or irrevocable, stated by the insurer rather than remembered.

Continue to the full explanation

Prepare for an existing policy review.

Sources

  • Policy contract, endorsements and insurer service records, insurer specific, verified 2026-08-30
  • Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association, published consumer materials, verified 2026-08-30

About the author

Jose Salloum, Financial Security Advisor

Jose Salloum is a Financial Security Advisor (conseiller en sécurité financière) certified by the Autorité des marchés financiers in Quebec, a Life and Accident & Sickness Insurance Agent licensed by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Ontario, and a Life Insurance Agent licensed by the Insurance Council of British Columbia. Licensed since 2001.

He has practised The Infinite Banking Concept® since 2015 and founded Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc., which operates as IBC Financial, in 2016. He holds the Infinite Banking Concepts® Authorized Practitioner certification from the Nelson Nash Institute. That is a private certification rather than a regulatory licence.

IBC Financial is the education platform of Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc. This page is general education and not advice on any individual file.

Read the full biography and the licence numbers

Accountability and disclosure

Written by
Jose Salloum
Professional capacity
Financial Security Advisor. Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc., operating as IBC Financial, places business in six provinces: Quebec, Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba and New Brunswick
Reviewed by
Insurance and contract education tier, reviewed under a licensed insurance professional's own authority
Jurisdiction
Canada wide
Last reviewed
2026-08-31
Version
2.1
Compensation disclosure
Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc., operating as IBC Financial, may receive insurer paid compensation if a policy is purchased. It takes the form of first year compensation followed by renewal compensation, and the amount varies by insurer, product, age, premium, contract design, riders and the arrangement with the managing general agency. No single figure would describe every contract honestly, and none is published here.
Report a correction
Info@ibcfinancial.com. Write without a policy number, medical information or account details.

Last reviewed 2026-08-31. By Jose Salloum, Financial Security Advisor.

Important disclosures

Who you are dealing with. IBC Financial is the education platform and trade name of Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc. (cwcc.ca), the firm registered with the Autorité des marchés financiers. IBC Financial holds no licence, distributes no product or service, gives no individualised advice, and concludes no transaction. Every client relationship, every piece of advice and every insurance product comes only through Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc. and its duly certified representatives.

Licensing. Jose Salloum is a Financial Security Advisor (conseiller en sécurité financière) certified by the Autorité des marchés financiers in Quebec, a Life and Accident & Sickness Insurance Agent licensed by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Ontario, and a Life Insurance Agent licensed by the Insurance Council of British Columbia. Licensed since 2001. His personal licensing covers Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia only. He holds the Infinite Banking Concepts® Authorized Practitioner certification from the Nelson Nash Institute and the Certified Cash Flow Specialist designation. These are private certifications, not regulatory licences, and confer no government authority. All credentials may be verified in the regulators' public registers.

Protected titles. Quebec and Ontario each reserve certain planning and advisory titles by statute, and only a person holding the matching designation may use them. Jose Salloum holds none of them and uses none of them. The title he holds is Financial Security Advisor (conseiller en sécurité financière), certified by the Autorité des marchés financiers, and that is the only title used on this website.

Compensation and conflict of interest. As a licensed insurance professional, Jose Salloum receives commissions from insurers when a client purchases a policy. The practice therefore has a commercial interest in the outcome, and states it here so you can weigh what you read. This website is the educational and marketing arm of Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc.

Nature of this website. This website is for general informational and educational purposes only. Nothing on it constitutes personalized financial, insurance, tax or legal advice, and reading it creates no professional-client relationship. Jose Salloum is a licensed insurance professional. He is not a Chartered Professional Accountant, he is not a lawyer, and he is not registered with the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization. He does not provide securities, tax or legal advice. Consult your own accountant and legal counsel before acting on anything described here.

About the products discussed. Participating whole life insurance is an insurance product, not an investment. Its primary purpose is the death benefit. Dividends are not guaranteed. They are declared annually at the discretion of the insurer's board of directors based on the performance of the participating account, and past dividend performance does not indicate future results. Contractual guarantees depend on the continued solvency of the issuing insurer and are not backed by any government. Policyholder protection in Canada is provided by Assuris, within its published limits. The Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation covers bank deposits and does not apply to insurance products. These strategies are not suitable for everyone and depend on individual circumstances, cash flow, time horizon and objectives.

Not a bank. Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc. and IBC Financial are not banks, are not deposit-taking institutions, and do not carry on banking business. Premiums paid into a policy are not deposits. Policy values are not deposits, are not held on deposit, and are not insured by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Tax note. Tax treatment depends on the policy remaining exempt under Regulation 306 of the Income Tax Regulations and on your own circumstances. A policy loan is a disposition under ITA s.148(9). Amounts above the adjusted cost basis may be taxable, and if the policy lapses or is surrendered while a loan is outstanding, the gain becomes taxable in that year. Consult a qualified tax professional before acting.

Trademarks and affiliation. "The Infinite Banking Concept®" and "Becoming Your Own Banker®" are marks of Infinite Banking Concepts, LLC. Neither Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc. nor Jose Salloum is affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Infinite Banking Concepts, LLC or the Nelson Nash Institute. "Infinite Financial Sovereignty®" is a registered trademark of Jose Salloum, Canadian Intellectual Property Office registration TMA1420283, registered 12 June 2026. "IFS™" is used as an unregistered abbreviation of that mark.

Provincial variation. Insurance licensing titles and requirements vary by province and territory. Verify your own advisor's licensing with the regulator in your province.

Privacy Policy. Person responsible for the protection of personal information: Mona Haddad, compliance@cwcc.ca, Canadian Wealth Creation Centre Inc., 203-3899 Autoroute des Laurentides, Laval, QC H7L 3H7, 514-875-9444.